<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Research: Cannabis use during pregnancy can impair fetal growth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://calpotnews.com/pot-pourri/research-cannabis-use-during-pregnancy-can-impair-fetal-growth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://calpotnews.com/pot-pourri/research-cannabis-use-during-pregnancy-can-impair-fetal-growth/</link>
	<description>News about California cannabis and medical marijuana</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:22:18 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bud</title>
		<link>http://calpotnews.com/pot-pourri/research-cannabis-use-during-pregnancy-can-impair-fetal-growth/comment-page-1/#comment-263</link>
		<dc:creator>Bud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 02:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calpotnews.com/?p=490#comment-263</guid>
		<description>Impaired fetal development is not the same thing as birth defects, though the former can certainly contribute to the latter. 

Since starting this blog, I&#039;ve noticed many advocates tend to treat any and all cannabis research with suspicion. It&#039;s an occupational hazard for researchers, I suspect, much as it is for journalists working in the mainstream media. A deeper understanding of the research tools used to evaluate health hazards in humans goes a long way in allaying such concerns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Impaired fetal development is not the same thing as birth defects, though the former can certainly contribute to the latter. </p>
<p>Since starting this blog, I&#8217;ve noticed many advocates tend to treat any and all cannabis research with suspicion. It&#8217;s an occupational hazard for researchers, I suspect, much as it is for journalists working in the mainstream media. A deeper understanding of the research tools used to evaluate health hazards in humans goes a long way in allaying such concerns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ</title>
		<link>http://calpotnews.com/pot-pourri/research-cannabis-use-during-pregnancy-can-impair-fetal-growth/comment-page-1/#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 19:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calpotnews.com/?p=490#comment-262</guid>
		<description>The title is severely misleading.  It implies that scientists have done experiments and found that marijuana smoking while pregnant leads to birth defects.  After reading the article, I realize this is nothing close to what it is about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The title is severely misleading.  It implies that scientists have done experiments and found that marijuana smoking while pregnant leads to birth defects.  After reading the article, I realize this is nothing close to what it is about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ernst</title>
		<link>http://calpotnews.com/pot-pourri/research-cannabis-use-during-pregnancy-can-impair-fetal-growth/comment-page-1/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>Ernst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 09:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calpotnews.com/?p=490#comment-153</guid>
		<description>This is not a study of Cannabis and woman.  

Why even bother to list it as such. A waste of time to click on the link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not a study of Cannabis and woman.  </p>
<p>Why even bother to list it as such. A waste of time to click on the link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
